By Brad Hunter, Charles Hewlett, Grace Amoh
It is perhaps not surprising that the upward trajectory of the RCLCO Real Estate Market Index (RMI) that had resumed in 2019, was completely upended with the mid-year 2020 survey results, a direct result of the economic shutdown and social distancing rules imposed in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. The U.S. economy and job markets have been in full-blown downturn mode over the past several months, but may be finding the bottom now, and the economy and real estate markets (with some notable exceptions) are expected to return to growth mode over the next several quarters.
The Current RMI fell into the basement to a value of 9.2, the lowest level since RCLCO began recording the index at the end of the Great Recession. The previous low was recorded in Q4 2018 at 37.5 in the wake of the U.S. Federal shutdown that occurred in December 2018. Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, in Q4 2019 the index was just under 65.0. RMI values in the 60 to 70+ range are typically indicative of very good market conditions. Values below 30 are typically coincident with periods of economic and real estate market stress/recession. The nearly 56-point drop in so short a period mirrors the speed and depth of the damage that the pandemic has wrought upon the U.S. economy and real estate markets.
SURVEY RESPONSES | CURRENT RMI USA | PREDICTED (12-MONTHS) RMI USA |
---|---|---|
Mid-2011 | 37.725 | 53.581 |
YE 2011 | 88.487 | 86.613 |
Mid-2012 | 70.968 | 81.106 |
YE 2012 | 90.079 | 90.964 |
Mid-2013 | 95.771 | 94.608 |
YE 2013 | 91.124 | 85.088 |
Mid-2014 | 87.013 | 86.087 |
YE 2014 | 88.285 | 83.058 |
Mid-2015 | 89.461 | 85.749 |
YE 2015 | 79.622 | 77.664 |
Mid-2016 | 63.32 | 66.057 |
YE 2016 | 71.467 | 64.754 |
Mid-2017 | 68.56 | 59.524 |
YE 2017 | 73.869 | 62.944 |
Mid-2018 | 68.426 | 54.656 |
YE 2018 | 37.519 | 26.248 |
Mid-2019 | 49.215 | 41.31 |
YE 2019 | 64.907 | 52.341 |
Mid-2020 | 9.167 | 36.808 |
Source: RCLCO
If there is a silver lining, it is that respondents expect that conditions will improve significantly over the next 12 months. The RCLCO Future RMI dropped somewhat from the Q4 2019 reading of 52.3 to 36.8, down more than 15 points, and so there is some optimism that the worst of the downturn may be behind us, and market participants are anticipating much better market conditions a year from now.
SURVEY RESPONSES | SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE | MODERATELY WORSE | UNCHANGED | MODERATELY BETTER | SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mid-2018 | 1.% | 14.14% | 32.87% | 39.04% | 12.95% |
YE 2018 | 1.52% | 46.42% | 29.07% | 19.03% | 3.96% |
Mid-2019 | .26% | 28.8% | 43.46% | 22.77% | 4.71% |
YE 2019 | .37% | 13.15% | 43.15% | 37.96% | 5.37% |
Mid-2020 | 33.15% | 54.81% | 5.74% | 5.19% | 1.11% |
Source: RCLCO
The change from the last survey is striking, with nearly 90% of respondents indicating that national real estate market conditions have gotten moderately or significantly worse compared with one year ago. This is a dramatic shift from the last survey at the end of 2019 when only 13% of respondents indicated that the market was only moderately worse than the previous 12-month period.
In addition to reflecting upon the past year, respondents were asked to predict how the U.S. economy and real estate markets would perform over the upcoming year. In most prior years, respondents have tended to predict that the U.S. economy and real estate markets would be in worse shape a year into the future—probably a reflection of late-cycle angst. Today there appears to be a high degree of uncertainty about the likely trajectory of the markets. The RCLCO Future RMI stands at 36.8, which is barely above the recession-level benchmark of 30, and there are twice as many respondents (60%) who believe the markets will be moderately or significantly worse one year from now than those that predict improving market conditions (30%).
The graph below shows the change in market sentiment over time, splitting out the responses saying that things would get worse, better, or stay the same. This graph combines together the responses saying that conditions will become “moderately worse” with those saying things will get “significantly worse,” but the reassuring thing is that the moderate responses (in both directions) far outweigh the “significant” changes.
SURVEY DATE | % PREDICTING MODERATELY OR SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER CONDITIONS | % PREDICTING MODERATELY OR SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE CONDITIONS | % PREDICTING UNCHANGED CONDITIONS |
---|---|---|---|
Mid-2011 | 33.25% | 27.04% | 39.72% |
YE 2011 | 82.57% | 1.97% | 15.46% |
Mid-2012 | 63.51% | 11.85% | 24.64% |
YE 2012 | 85.54% | 4.02% | 10.44% |
Mid-2013 | 85.57% | 2.49% | 11.94% |
YE 2013 | 78.11% | 4.73% | 17.16% |
Mid-2014 | 73.25% | 4.39% | 22.37% |
YE 2014 | 78.21% | 8.12% | 13.68% |
Mid-2015 | 69.95% | 7.39% | 22.66% |
YE 2015 | 47.3% | 17.01% | 35.68% |
Mid-2016 | 33.61% | 34.02% | 32.37% |
YE 2016 | 53.01% | 23.5% | 23.5% |
Mid-2017 | 43.98% | 24.93% | 31.09% |
YE 2017 | 45.69% | 19.8% | 34.52% |
Mid-2018 | 38.46% | 29.15% | 32.39% |
YE 2018 | 12.71% | 60.21% | 27.08% |
Mid-2019 | 21.39% | 38.77% | 39.84% |
YE 2019 | 31.27% | 26.59% | 42.13% |
Mid-2020 | 32.84% | 59.23% | 7.93% |
Source: RCLCO
Again, in search of a silver lining, it is perhaps comforting that only a relatively small percentage (<16%) believe the markets will be “significantly worse” over the next 12 months. In summary, these industry leaders see more adjustment ahead, but they see the severe declines as being in the rearview.
Survey respondents universally believe that every major real estate sector has jumped from expansion to contraction in the first half of 2020. The exception is industrial, and particularly the big box warehouse, logistics, cold storage and last-mile distribution sectors, which have not been impacted in any meaningful way, and in fact, may have seen an increase in demand as e-commerce sales and home delivery have seen a surge in the pandemic. Most believe that the multifamily rental, active adult, and for-sale residential sectors have already hit bottom, along with land; although the second home/resort, and seniors housing (IL, AL/MC) are still in full downturn mode and may have some time before hitting bottom.
The majority of respondents indicate that the hotel sector is still experiencing declining market fundamentals, although the largest share of predictions by our panelists see the sector starting to recover within a year. This is consistent with the data that shows improving (albeit still historically low) hotel occupancy rates and increasing TSA checkpoint travel data that indicates that Americans are beginning to travel again (but again, still at levels far below that of previous years).
The office sector is judged at this time to be just hitting the bottom and is expected to remain at the bottom into the next 12 months as the economy struggles to get completely back to work. However, NCREIF data released this past week indicates that office rent collections in the private open-ended fund world actually improved in June (though June 15th) 2020 compared with May, and are above 91% collected.
Retail continues to struggle, and survey respondents expect this sector to remain in “bottom” conditions into 2021. While NCREIF reports that rent collections in this sector have improved since May, this sector lags all other real estate food groups with rent collections under 60% so far in the month of June.
Multifamily rental apartments are holding up well so far in this crisis, but there are concerns about rent collections continuing after some of the government relief programs start to expire. As noted above, multifamily is believed to be at “bottom” already, and is expected to be in or near an improving status in a year’s time.
Consistent with the expectation that the for-sale residential sector will be relatively close to “early recovery” mode in a year, RCLCO has learned from its master-planned community developer and homebuilder clients that sales and traffic rebounded strongly in May and June, after dropping precipitously in the early stages of the pandemic in mid-March through early April.
We noted that this June 2020 survey portrays a snapshot in time. It does also capture an inflection point. Several respondents indicated that we are at the “bottom,” particularly in hospitality and retail. It also paints a picture of a mixed bag, with some types of real estate still in decline and just a few that might be getting to the other side, starting “early recovery.”
The survey results are an aggregation of sentiment about many different types of real estate, some with brighter prospects than others in the immediate term. Retail is in a serious downturn and still headed lower, while residential real estate is in fairly good shape, with more strength expected in the year to come. Even within retail, there are some types that are weaker than others.
As shown in the aggregated table above, 31% expect the hospitality industry to be in “early recovery” a year from now, a higher percentage by a wide margin than other sectors. Hotels were among the hardest-hit businesses, but once there is any uptick in travel, they will start to do better, although full recovery will certainly take some time.
The for-sale housing sector went through a short pause in March and April, and then strengthened rapidly in May and June. As a consequence, the June survey reading for this sector is spread between “late stable” and “early downturn.” Separate from this survey, RCLCO is hearing builders say that May was an “amazing” month in terms of the strength of sales, with a few saying that May was their best month ever. This sentiment seems to have continued into June.
TYPE | EARLY STABLE | LATE STABLE | EARLY DOWNTURN | FULL DOWNTURN | BOTTOM | EARLY RECOVERY | DO NOT KNOW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land/Lot Developer – MPC | 14.44% | 27.03% | 24.41% | 7.61% | 5.77% | 9.45% | 11.29% |
Land/Lot Developer – Subdivision | 15.07% | 25.48% | 24.38% | 6.3% | 8.49% | 8.77% | 11.51% |
Home Builder | 17.86% | 31.32% | 17.86% | 5.49% | 7.42% | 10.44% | 9.62% |
Condominium | 10.2% | 13.6% | 31.16% | 10.2% | 9.63% | 5.38% | 19.83% |
Land Owner | 7.3% | 25.28% | 26.4% | 10.11% | 11.24% | 6.74% | 12.92% |
Resort/Second Home | 7.98% | 12.54% | 25.64% | 18.52% | 8.26% | 4.84% | 22.22% |
Source: RCLCO
In the residential category, of the various business types, “land-owner” has the highest number saying that it is at the “bottom,” but the largest share think that land owners are in “late stable” or “early downturn” status. In the homebuilder category, 10.4% say they are in “early recovery.”
Within the next twelve months, homebuilders, subdivision developers, and master-planned communities are expected by the largest number of participants to be past the downturn and well into “stable” business conditions. This is consistent with RCLCO’s expectations that strong household formation rates will resume, driving demand for new homes.
TYPE | EARLY STABLE | LATE STABLE | EARLY DOWNTURN | FULL DOWNTURN | BOTTOM | EARLY RECOVERY | DO NOT KNOW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land/Lot Developer – MPC | 16.18% | 22.02% | 13.53% | 9.02% | 6.63% | 20.42% | 12.2% |
Land/Lot Developer – Subdivision | 17.22% | 24.17% | 11.11% | 8.06% | 7.5% | 18.89% | 13.06% |
Home Builder | 21.23% | 25.42% | 12.01% | 6.42% | 5.03% | 17.6% | 12.29% |
Condominium | 10.29% | 11.14% | 13.43% | 14.29% | 11.14% | 17.43% | 22.29% |
Land Owner | 11.11% | 16.52% | 17.66% | 10.54% | 9.12% | 18.8% | 16.24% |
Resort/Second Home | 8.96% | 9.54% | 11.56% | 15.9% | 14.74% | 13.87% | 25.43% |
Source: RCLCO
The verdict is decisive for the hotel industry. Respondents judge the hospitality sector to mostly be in either “full downturn” or at the “bottom.” The business/luxury hotels and the resorts are the hotel types that are considered to be most clearly at or near the bottom. Participants consider extended stay hotels are better off, with a larger share in the “late stable” realm. Home sharing/AirBNB/VRBO is considered to be deep into decline or at the bottom, but is also heavy in “don’t know” responses, reflecting the uncertain future of this type of real estate.
TYPE OF HOSPITALITY | EARLY STABLE | LATE STABLE | EARLY DOWNTURN | FULL DOWNTURN | BOTTOM | EARLY RECOVERY | DO NOT KNOW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business/Luxury | 2.28% | 5.94% | 15.07% | 36.99% | 22.83% | 3.2% | 13.7% |
Select Service | 1.9% | 7.62% | 12.86% | 33.81% | 20.95% | 5.71% | 17.14% |
Budget | 3.33% | 11.9% | 15.24% | 29.52% | 20.% | 5.71% | 14.29% |
Extended Stay | 2.86% | 12.38% | 15.24% | 24.76% | 21.9% | 6.19% | 16.67% |
Resort | 1.4% | 4.21% | 13.55% | 36.45% | 23.83% | 4.21% | 16.36% |
Home Sharing/Airbnb/VRBO | 2.86% | 6.19% | 16.19% | 27.62% | 20.% | 9.05% | 18.1% |
Source: RCLCO
The graph below shows the future expectations for the hospitality industry, and suggests that the sector will come off the bottom and be in “early recovery” within a year.
TYPE OF HOSPITALITY | EARLY STABLE | LATE STABLE | EARLY DOWNTURN | FULL DOWNTURN | BOTTOM | EARLY RECOVERY | DO NOT KNOW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business/Luxury | 8.65% | 4.33% | 8.17% | 18.27% | 17.79% | 28.37% | 14.42% |
Select Service | 11.39% | 4.95% | 9.9% | 14.85% | 14.85% | 26.24% | 17.82% |
Budget | 13.86% | 8.42% | 8.91% | 14.36% | 14.36% | 23.27% | 16.83% |
Extended Stay | 12.81% | 9.85% | 9.85% | 15.27% | 12.32% | 22.66% | 17.24% |
Resort | 9.18% | 3.38% | 5.8% | 20.29% | 12.08% | 29.95% | 19.32% |
Home Sharing/Airbnb/VRBO | 11.88% | 8.91% | 4.95% | 18.81% | 8.42% | 23.76% | 23.27% |
Source: RCLCO
A majority (57%) of RCLCO Sentiment Survey respondents believe the “Fall Swoosh” downturn and recovery scenario is the most likely trajectory for the U.S. economy. Only 10% believe that a relatively quick “Summer V-Curve” is any longer in the cards; and a fairly sizable share (26%) are not ruling out an “Extended-U” scenario that would entail a longer and potentially deeper downturn.
CURVE TYPE | RESPONSES |
---|---|
Fall Swoosh | 57.07% |
Extended U | 26.09% |
Summer V | 10.33% |
Do Not Know/No Opinion | 3.8% |
Other | 2.72% |
Source: RCLCO
RCLCO Recovery Scenarios
Source: RCLCO
These results are consistent with the current RCLCO point of view (POV). Under the “Fall Swoosh” scenario, the U.S. economy is expected to experience a partial snap-back in H2 2020 as states begin a staged re-opening, but regional differences in the trajectory of the coronavirus hot spots force governments (especially in the South and West) to keep restrictions in place longer and suppress consumer confidence, which leads to a slower recovery. Unemployment likely peaks in Q2 2020, but remains elevated and is slower to come down. In this baseline case, U.S. GDP for 2020 is likely to decline -7.4% overall, with Q4 2019 levels of economic activity not reached again until Q1 2022, and full employment is regained by 2023.
Most respondents said that the impact of their chosen forecast pattern on various sectors of real estate would range from “moderate” to “severe.” “Moderate” was defined as a 5%-9% negative impact on NOI, prices, or valuation, and “severe” was defined as a 10%-20% reduction in NOI, prices, or valuation. A “dramatic” impact was defined as a reduction greater than 20%.
Across the for-rent residential categories, for the most part, affordable/subsidized housing was judged to be unaffected by the forecast, and that was true of single-family for-rent as well. This is consistent with the way we at RCLCO see things playing out as well. Rental apartments are expected to see only a “moderate” effect from the economic swing. Student housing is expected by the largest group to suffer a “severe” impact from the economic scenario. Seniors housing and co-living both had the largest number (by a wide margin) of respondents saying “don’t know,” reflecting the high level of uncertainty and risk associated with those uses. In the office category, Class-A offices are expected to have a “moderate” reaction to the economic situation, but the impact on co-working is expected to be “dramatic.” In the retail category, the impact of the economic cycle on secondary regional malls is judged to be “dramatic” (47.0% of respondents). Meanwhile, grocery-anchored community/neighborhood centers will feel a “minimal” effect.
The following exhibit summarizes various sectors at a glance.
Source: RCLCO
Respondents were asked, based upon the economic forecast scenario they selected as closest to their own, how that scenario would likely affect their ability to secure capital for their real estate activities. Most said that there would be “sufficient,” but not “abundant” capital. The greatest shortfalls are expected in securing equity for planned new developments, with 47% expecting “limited availability.”
FUNDING SCENARIO | NO AVAILABILITY | LIMITED AVAILABILITY | SUFFICIENT AVAILABILITY | ABUNDANT AVAILABILITY | DO NOT KNOW/NO OPINION |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continued funding of projects under construction | .63% | 18.81% | 64.26% | 11.91% | 4.39% |
Securing construction debt for planned new developments | 1.9% | 58.54% | 32.28% | 3.16% | 4.11% |
Securing equity for planned new developments | 3.8% | 46.84% | 38.61% | 6.01% | 4.75% |
Securing debt for refinancing/recapitalization of stabilized income producing real estate assets | 1.28% | 24.6% | 50.8% | 15.65% | 7.67% |
Securing equity for refinancing/recapitalization of stabilized income producing real estate assets | 1.29% | 23.79% | 47.91% | 17.68% | 9.32% |
Source: RCLCO
Only 6% said that there would be abundant availability for equity for new developments. Ongoing construction is widely expected to continue to get funding, with 64% saying that there would be sufficient availability of money. Construction debt for new planned developments is seen as being available on a limited basis.
These results are generally in line with our experience from our consulting work, in which projects are being held to tougher underwriting standards, but the good projects are getting funded. Had we asked how this differs for the various real estate sectors, we would have expected to hear that industrial, particularly the big box segment, has hardly skipped a beat, but that any new project with a hotel or retail component has been delayed. And in just the last few weeks, we have learned that transaction volume in the favored multifamily rental sector, which had dropped to nearly zero in the early stages of the pandemic, is starting to make a strong comeback, and that many of the deals that had been pulled from the market in Q1 and Q2 2020 are likely to come back to the market in H2 2020, with very little, and for some of the best assets no, repricing. In the homebuilding space, while many builders sharply curtailed the number of spec homes started, many MPC and land developers continued with lots under development, and while many decided to delay the next phase of lots until there was better clarity on the impact of the pandemic, many have pressed forward with new phases as sales have snapped back to trend line.
Current status and near-term outlook (as of June 2020)
While the reopening of the U.S. economy that began in May continues to progress, the lack of effective therapies and/or broad testing makes consumers cautious and keeps the economy from becoming fully engaged for the balance of 2020 and into the beginning of 2021. This underpins the uncertainty about the outlook. The RCLCO base case assumes that the U.S. economy returns to 2019 GDP levels by Q4 2021, or Q1 2022.
Publicus Community is not affiliated with RCLCO. The article provided is purely informational.